W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > August 2006

Re: still busy

From: Elias Torres <elias@torrez.us>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:47:38 -0400
Message-ID: <44EAFCEA.2020305@torrez.us>
To: mark.birbeck@x-port.net
CC: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org

Besides everything on my email [1] we could go over a couple of things.
For example, the fact that rel="has multiple relationships" bit me the
other day.

"""The processor rule is simple: each of these attributes generates
exactly one triple."""

I'm not sure whether it's needed to say that each of those attributes
may have multiple values. :)

Another is the lack of text defining datatype="plaintext" and the
overuse of rdfs:XMLLiteral.

One last one for now is that I was pointed by Eric van der Vlist that
the XHTML 2.0 spec [2] says that if datatype is not defined the default
value is xsd:string.

If you think these warrant a call, I'll be glad to join in.

-Elias

[1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Jun/0008.html
[2]
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xhtml2-20060726/mod-metaAttributes.html#adef_metaAttributes_datatype

Mark Birbeck wrote:
> Hi Elias,
> 
> Would you have the issues that you were thinking of bringing up ready
> for the call today?
> 
> The general plan that we're following at the moment is of focusing on
> implentations for the immediate period. We are also looking at
> resolving issues ready for another draft in the autumn, but I'm not
> sure it's fair on Ben to discuss issues today whilst he's away. ;) So
> anything to do with the implementation of RDFa would be ideal fodder
> for a call today.
> 
> All the best,
> 
> Mark
> 
> 
> On 20/08/06, Elias Torres <elias@torrez.us> wrote:
>> I'm for it if no other personal scheduling conflicts arise. I had a
>> series of things to bring up as per my interactions with users of my
>> RDFa extractor. I had them fresh for last week's meeting but I never
>> wrote them down. I'm also waiting for Ben's answers to Lee and I's
>> feedback on the syntax spec.
>>
>> What are our milestones? Is there another update to the spec scheduled?
>>
>> -Elias
>>
>> Mark Birbeck wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Ben,
>> >
>> > No problem...deadlines, we understand. ;)
>> >
>> > If others are up for a call, then I'm happy to go ahead.
>> >
>> > All the best,
>> >
>> > Mark
>> >
>> >
>> > On 20/08/06, Ben Adida <ben@mit.edu> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> Well, I hate to make excuses, but the last stretch of my thesis
>> editing
>> >> is simply keeping me far far too busy. I've been completely unable to
>> >> keep any of my other commitments.
>> >>
>> >> Mark, if you'd like to lead a telecon, please do go ahead! I will be
>> >> back on track in 2 weeks, but right now, I have to be realistic: the
>> >> thesis has to take precedence, as my end-of-summer deadline is
>> >> non-negotiable.
>> >>
>> >> -Ben
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 22 August 2006 12:48:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:15:02 GMT