- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 09:31:49 +0200
- To: Dave Beckett <Dave.Beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, dean@w3.org
* Dave Beckett wrote: >It's an amusing idea for this to obsolete RDF/XML, but incomplete and >non-optimal compared to RDF/XML, for writing some RDF triples (XML >literals for example) and a solution for XHTML2 only. It's disappointing that you describe ideas of this task force, which has an important charter to fulfill, as "amusing". >People are very recently creating new formats that are difficult or >impossible to validate with XML schemas or DTDs. For example, Atom 1.0 >which only has a RELAXNG schema. Just like the RDF/XML REC has >(informative) and for very similar reasons - flexibility in inclusion of >XML and allowing validation specified by namespaces; which is >trickier/impossible in WXS. If you mean that making formats that are difficult to validate using DTDs and XML Schema might be acceptable, I must urge you to read e.g. <http://infomesh.net/2002/rdfinhtml/#embedNoValidate> which you will find convincing with respect to why it is impossible for XHTML 2.0 to allow for use of RDF/XML syntax. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Monday, 12 September 2005 07:31:29 UTC