Re: "Reject RDF/A" [was: [HTML] Re: additional GRDDL editor]

* Dan Connolly wrote:
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2004Nov/0007

>Well, I'd like to see a reply either way.

Hi Dan, I just got the response to my 200+ lines list of technical
concerns regarding RDF/A:

  Thanks for your comment.  While we value your input, at this time we
  are not able to agree with your request.  The RDF/A activity has
  substantial support and discussion in the community, and supporting
  embedded meta information in a consistent, intuitive, and relatively
  easy manner is a major requirement for XHTML 2.

This seems to be a persuasive technical argument, so while I have to
think about this a bit more, I should probably join the community in
supporting RDF/A...
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 

Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2005 22:49:20 UTC