W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > May 2005

Re: [HTML] Re: additional GRDDL editor

From: Ben Adida <ben@mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 20:21:01 -0400
Message-Id: <09a772935555345b9aa3c9cd8c688a93@mit.edu>
Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, public-swbp-wg@w3.org
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>

On May 19, 2005, at 8:05 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:

> http://www.w3.org/2003/03/rdf-in-xml.html is last updated two years
> ago, again discussing essentially non-issues like backwards-compati-
> bility, character entities, validation, etc. The current dominant
> position that "The RDF MUST NOT have to be reformatted from RDF/XML"
> is interesting though, clearly RDF/A fails to meet that requirement
> (and some others) ...

That document was updated a long time ago, though the links apparently 
were not. That's my fault. Here's the most current version:


However, your approach in this discussion seems disingenuous. All of 
these issues have been *publicly* discussed in our forums many times. 
None of this is new. The reasons here have been clear for a while.

I'm going to have to agree with Mark here: you're not going to be 
convinced. You're opposed to the goal and thus to the solution. That's 
fine, but we have an important charter here that we need to fulfill.

Received on Friday, 20 May 2005 00:21:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:50:19 UTC