W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > May 2005

Re: [HTML] Re: additional GRDDL editor

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 02:05:39 +0200
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Cc: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, public-swbp-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <429520d4.38121953@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>

* Dan Brickley wrote:
>Did you not see http://www.w3.org/2003/03/rdf-in-xml.html ? Perhaps it
>should be cited more prominently from the Working Draft? 
>
>Also http://www.w3.org/2003/08/rdf-in-xhtml-charter.html
>
>http://infomesh.net/2002/rdfinhtml/ discusses some details...

I am aware of all these documents, but I am not sure how the pointers
could help here? http://infomesh.net/2002/rdfinhtml/ for example is
concerned with DTD validation and compatibility to HTML user agents,
neither of which if relevant for XHTML 2.0 (though the HTML Working
Group probably still needs to be convinced of this fact [1]); the
http://www.w3.org/2003/08/rdf-in-xhtml-charter.html charter does not
really have considerable technical content.

http://www.w3.org/2003/03/rdf-in-xml.html is last updated two years
ago, again discussing essentially non-issues like backwards-compati-
bility, character entities, validation, etc. The current dominant
position that "The RDF MUST NOT have to be reformatted from RDF/XML"
is interesting though, clearly RDF/A fails to meet that requirement
(and some others) ...

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator/2004Jul/0236
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
Received on Friday, 20 May 2005 00:05:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:59 GMT