The SWBP WG has just endorsed this change, if the message has not yet been sent. Jeremy Dan Connolly wrote: > On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 17:26 -0400, Ben Adida wrote: > >>Hi all, >> >>I took an action today to write up our task force high-level statement >>on RDF/A, in part because we simply didn't finish during the telecon, >>and in part because it would be quite useful to have wide task-force >>agreement. >> >>Here's my proposed statement, based on consensus between DanC, JJC, >>RalphS, and BenA: >> >>"We find RDF/A to be a big step forward and encourage the HTML WG to >>use it in place of the 22 July MetaInformation module. Our forthcoming >>detailed comments and suggestions on RDF/A are intended to perfect this >>work in fulfilling the long-standing needs of the RDF deployment >>community to embed semantic web data within HTML documents." >> >>Please send feedback on this point ASAP! > > > > seems worth clarifying what we mean by RDF/A... > > RDF/A Syntax > A collection of attributes for layering RDF on XML languages > note 11 October 2004 > This version: > Editors: > Mark Birbeck, x-port.net Ltd. <Mark.Birbeck@x-port.net> > Steven Pemberton, CWI > http://www.formsplayer.com/notes/rdf-a.html > > > > >>-Ben > >Received on Monday, 1 November 2004 17:29:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:59 GMT