W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org > January 2004

Re: let's specify meaning rather than processing

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 17:01:28 +0000
Message-ID: <401547E8.9040408@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org

Thinking a little more about implementing this, I find that I need a 
resolution mechanism to determine what script to run given the namespace 
of the XML root element.

Hold on while I prepare a fox hole to duck into ...

What I'd rather have is the url of the transform right there in the xml 
document, and I wonder about using the same machanism as browsers use to 
specify a stylesheet, i.e a processing instruction.

Diving for foxhole now ...

Brian


Dan Connolly wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 08:41, Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux wrote:
> 
>>Le sam 17/01/2004 ŗ 00:00, Dan Connolly a ťcrit :
>>
>>>That was a great start. After working thru various technical
>>>details (grokRDDL and such) I found some inspiration to do
>>>some writing today. What do you think of this new draft?
>>
>>Looks great! (FWIW, I've fixed a few typos spotted by ,spell)
> 
> 
> I moved the history/rationale to separate page:
> 
> GRDDL Background: Design History and Rationale
> http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/specbg.html
> $Revision: 1.2 $ of $Date: 2004/01/20 23:23:51 $ by $Author: connolly $
> 
> <-
> http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec
> $Revision: 1.19 $ $Date: 2004/01/20 23:24:05 $
> 
> Tim, I'm thinking about specbg as a TAG finding on
> issue 35.
> 
Received on Monday, 26 January 2004 12:03:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:14:58 GMT