W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2013

RE: book-keeping & suggesting some PROPOSALs to approve per email

From: Polleres, Axel <axel.polleres@siemens.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 12:36:00 +0100
To: "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <9DA51FFE5E84464082D7A089342DEEE8015A1B208378@ATVIES9917WMSX.ww300.siemens.net>
> As things stand, I don't see the requirement to have another official meeting today

s/today/tomorrow/



;-)



From: Polleres, Axel
Sent: Montag, 14. Jšnner 2013 12:05
To: Polleres, Axel; public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Subject: RE: book-keeping & suggesting some PROPOSALs to approve per email



Dear all,



As things stand, I don't see the requirement to have another official meeting today and would consider (checking the mail responses)

the following RESOLVED



RESOLVED: approve editorial fix in query as per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0210.html

RESOLVED: approve editorial fix in Overview as per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0209.html

RESOLVED: remove all unapproved test cases from the manifests (and move them to a separate folder for "unapproved" test cases)



As for comments, with the last two acknowledgements (JW-2 [1], JS-1 [2]) and the response sent to TH-1 [3], which are now all documented at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments I understand that all the questions which came up during the transition meeting are addressed now.



@Sandro, let us know if you need anything specific to proceed.



Apart from that, thanks again to all for your help getting this far!



Axel



1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2013Jan/0000.html

2. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2013Jan/0001.html

2. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2012Dec/0000.html

From: Polleres, Axel
Sent: Dienstag, 18. Dezember 2012 11:30
To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Subject: book-keeping & suggesting some PROPOSALs to approve per email



Reading the recent comments and mails, it sounds to me that we probably may need at least to make some

decisions (mostly book-keeping). I don't think that any of these issues prevent us from publishing

as planned, but it would be good to have them clarified:



I see the following:

1)      Minor editorial fixes in drafts before publication http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0211.html

2)      Test suite bugs

3)      Removing uncommented test cases



I hope we can sort these things out per email, so I'm giving it a try, please post your replies or comments to the following proposals to the list:



PROPOSED: approve editorial fix in query as per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0210.html

PROPOSED: approve editorial fix in Overview as per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0209.html

 PROPOSED: remove all unapproved test cases from the manifests (and move them to a separate folder for "unapproved" test cases)



If a sufficient quorum has time and enthusiasm to gather on IRC today at the regular time, maybe some of the things can be sorted out/further discussed there quickly (unfortunately, I won't be able to make it). Otherwise, just in case, if we have any concerns on  the proposals above which we can't sort out per email I suggest:



PROPOSED:  Telco:  15 Jan 2013,  Time of Call: 15:00 UK<http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?year=2011&month=09&day=20&hour=10:00&min=00&sec=0&p1=43>, 10:00 (East US) ... if any of the proposals above raises objections



FWIW, I vote "+1" to all of the above.



Best  regards,

Axel



p.s.: this does not yet contain any proposal on how to proceed with the comment we got on the protocol validator, cf. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2012Dec/0006.html ... hope this will sorty out per email, if

someone more swapped in could take care, it'd be appreciated!
Received on Monday, 14 January 2013 11:36:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:50 GMT