W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2012

book-keeping & suggesting some PROPOSALs to approve per email

From: Polleres, Axel <axel.polleres@siemens.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 11:29:54 +0100
To: "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <9DA51FFE5E84464082D7A089342DEEE8015A16081899@ATVIES9917WMSX.ww300.siemens.net>
Reading the recent comments and mails, it sounds to me that we probably may need at least to make some

decisions (mostly book-keeping). I don't think that any of these issues prevent us from publishing

as planned, but it would be good to have them clarified:



I see the following:

1)      Minor editorial fixes in drafts before publication http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0211.html

2)      Test suite bugs

3)      Removing uncommented test cases



I hope we can sort these things out per email, so I'm giving it a try, please post your replies or comments to the following proposals to the list:



PROPOSED: approve editorial fix in query as per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0210.html

PROPOSED: approve editorial fix in Overview as per http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0209.html

 PROPOSED: remove all unapproved test cases from the manifests (and move them to a separate folder for "unapproved" test cases)



If a sufficient quorum has time and enthusiasm to gather on IRC today at the regular time, maybe some of the things can be sorted out/further discussed there quickly (unfortunately, I won't be able to make it). Otherwise, just in case, if we have any concerns on  the proposals above which we can't sort out per email I suggest:



PROPOSED:  Telco:  15 Jan 2013,  Time of Call: 15:00 UK<http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?year=2011&month=09&day=20&hour=10:00&min=00&sec=0&p1=43>, 10:00 (East US) ... if any of the proposals above raises objections



FWIW, I vote "+1" to all of the above.



Best  regards,

Axel



p.s.: this does not yet contain any proposal on how to proceed with the comment we got on the protocol validator, cf. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2012Dec/0006.html ... hope this will sorty out per email, if

someone more swapped in could take care, it'd be appreciated!
Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2012 10:44:34 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:49 GMT