W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: ACTION-716: Add more RIF test cases

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 00:42:03 -0500
Message-ID: <50B452AB.1000909@thefigtrees.net>
To: Chime Ogbuji <chimezie@gmail.com>
CC: SPARQL Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Thanks, Chime.

In reviewing last week's minutes, there was talk about sync'ing up with 
Mike Dean on (I believe) the RIF tests. Have you had a chance to do that?

Lee

On 11/25/2012 10:09 PM, Chime Ogbuji wrote:
> I have added new SPARQL 1.1 RIF Entailment Regime tests from those listed here:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Category:Core_Test
>
> In the end, 4 additional tests were added (rif03, rif04, rif05, and rif06).
>
> rif03 is a basic test of Frames and rif04 is an interesting case that simultaneously exercises OWL and RIF Core entailment.  rif04.ttl imports an OWL ontology (Modeling_Brain_Anatomy-import001.rdf) using the entailment:OWL-Direct profile.  rif05 tests the importing of RDF into the referenced RIF Core document as well as the use of builtins.  rif06 tests interaction between RDF and RIF with respect to blank nodes.
>
> The guideline I used in picking from these tests was to select those involving implication over facts, with terms (positional or Frames) that were compatible with RDF (binary terms, for example), and were in the  PositiveEntailmentTest category.
>
> These have been committed to CVS:
>
> rev 1.24 "Added 4 additional SPARQL 1.1 RIF Entailment tests from http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Category:Core_Test"
>
> I'm not sure what the process is for producing a new archive, but the file (sparql11-test-suite-20121023.tar.gz) referenced in http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/ needs to be updated for prospective implementations to use in generating their reports
>
Received on Tuesday, 27 November 2012 05:42:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:49 GMT