W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: SPARQL TC SPARQL 2012-11-13 (RE: SPARQL publications done)

From: Chime Ogbuji <chimezie@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 17:56:15 -0500
To: Polleres, Axel <axel.polleres@siemens.com>
Cc: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, SPARQL WG <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <748A8600708D4E82954CDC437FC05C6D@gmail.com>
Unfortunately, I'll have to send my regrets for tomorrow.  I have another hard conflict. 

-- 
Chime Ogbuji
Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com)


On Monday, November 12, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Polleres, Axel wrote:

> Dear all,
> 
> I'll suggest we have have a quick call tomorrow to discuss how we can address the points that sandro mentions below.
> i.e. 
> 1) contacting AC Reps
> 2) next steps forward for CR docs, i.e. contacting implementers, completing test suites
> 
> For those at ISWC, if you could gather there and in case you can't dial in let us know any ideas 
> you have to proceed on these points on the mailinglist, that'd be great. 
> 
> Dial-in data as usual.
> 
> Thanks,
> Axel
> ________________________________________
> From: Sandro Hawke [sandro@w3.org (mailto:sandro@w3.org)]
> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 3:48 PM
> To: SPARQL WG
> Subject: SPARQL publications done
> 
> BTW, the publications happened, as planned:
> Eleven SPARQL 1.1 Specifications Published<http://www.w3.org/News/2012#entry-9624>
> http://www.w3.org/News/2012#entry-9624
> 
> Next steps?
> 
> 1. Circulate news of the Proposed Recommendations to any AC Reps you know. We need their feedback. In the "Status of the Document" section there's a link to their "review form". So far, four days into the four week review period, we have reviews from Lex Machina and Garlik. (Thanks Gavin and Steve!)
> 
> 2. Circulate news of the Candidate Recommendations to anyone who might be implementing, asking for their feedback.
> 
> 
> 1. SPARQL 1.1 Entailment Regimes<http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-entailment/> - defines the semantics of SPARQL queries under entailment regimes such as RDF Schema, OWL, or RIF.
> 2. SPARQL 1.1 Protocol for RDF<http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-protocol/> - A protocol defining means for conveying arbitrary SPARQL queries and update requests to a SPARQL service.
> 3. SPARQL 1.1 Graph Store HTTP Protocol<http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-http-rdf-update/> - As opposed to the full SPARQL protocol, this specification defines minimal means for managing RDF graph content directly via common HTTP operations.
> 
> I'm at ISWC this week, so regrets for tomorrow, if there's a meeting.
> 
> -- Sandro 
Received on Monday, 12 November 2012 22:56:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:49 GMT