W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2012

comment JS-1 clarification

From: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 12:37:51 -0500
Message-Id: <9FC0384B-8437-4EDA-993E-066F77BF671F@evilfunhouse.com>
To: SPARQL WG <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I was going to send a response to John Snelson regarding his new comment about "ORDER BY and literals", but wanted to clarify on the list first.

My understanding is that he is confusing "RDF literals with type xsd:string" with literals for which DATATYPE() returns xsd:string. Admittedly this is a bit confusing with the new DATATYPE() definition, but it's the awkward position we're in by basing SPARQL on RDF 1.0 but wanting to be foreward looking w.r.t. RDF 1.1, right?

.greg
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2012 17:38:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:49 GMT