W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2012

Re: uniform "changes since LC" sections (Action-707 part 1 ...)

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 08:20:56 -0400
Message-ID: <5093BAA8.1020109@thefigtrees.net>
To: birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de
CC: "Polleres, Axel" <axel.polleres@siemens.com>, "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
That's correct, Birte. We'd like it as an appendix and then there will 
be a standard Status section that links to the appendix. This way we can 
have a consistent SotD section for all documents.

Lee

On 11/1/2012 4:09 AM, Birte Glimm wrote:
> I've put this at the end of the document (appendix) since it seemed to
> me from the minutes that Sandro wanted it out of the status section,
> but I haven't been at the teleconf, so I might misinterpret the
> minutes.
>
> Birte
>
> On 31 October 2012 20:03, Polleres, Axel <axel.polleres@siemens.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I started putting the "Changes since LC" section into the Update document, cf.
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/update-1.1/Overview.xml#changes-since-lc
>>
>> For completing ACTION-707, I suggest to put this in the same format (i.e move the different versions of how changes were summarized under
>> the same header and anchor, at the end of the Status sectionfor each document) across all documents, that is:
>> ------------
>> <div id="changes-since-lc">
>> <p><b>Changes since Last Call</b></p>
>> <p>The following editorial changes have been made since <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-sparql11-update-20120105/">Last Call</a> publication of this document:</p>
>> ...
>> </div>
>> -----------
>>
>> Since I won't get to this before Friday, if any of the editors has time to do it themselves for their reps. documents,
>> feel free to follow the example.
>>
>> Thanks for the help,
>> Axel
>>
>
>
Received on Friday, 2 November 2012 12:21:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:49 GMT