W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: protocol test case compllleteness

From: Carlos Buil Aranda <cbuilaranda@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 10:45:44 -0400
Message-ID: <CABdcz9Htvs_p3RBs7BuHmdMbFBw0+b8BGc-HYGmUpcTd1=tisg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
yes, I'm saying that these parts of the spec aren tested for GET, only for
POST. Tests for GET should be present.

Carlos

2012/9/4 Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>

> On Sep 4, 2012, at 9:10 AM, Carlos Buil Aranda wrote:
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I wrote in the wiki the analysis of the protocol test cases
> completeness:
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/ProtocolTestCasesCompleteness
>
> Carlos,
>
> I didn't understand your summary: "As a summary, the tests cover all the
> oprations described in the specification but the tests one or more graphs
> ("named-graph-uri" and "default-graph-uri" (0 or more))."
>
> Is this saying some spec text isn't tested? Or that some tests need
> updating?
>
> thanks,
> .greg
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2012 14:46:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:49 GMT