W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2012

Re: protocol test case compllleteness

From: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 09:44:43 -0400
Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <5AFBC617-7E2C-4B4C-8758-448D042B3559@evilfunhouse.com>
To: Carlos Buil Aranda <cbuilaranda@gmail.com>
On Sep 4, 2012, at 9:10 AM, Carlos Buil Aranda wrote:

> Dear all,
> I wrote in the wiki the analysis of the protocol test cases completeness: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/ProtocolTestCasesCompleteness


I didn't understand your summary: "As a summary, the tests cover all the oprations described in the specification but the tests one or more graphs ("named-graph-uri" and "default-graph-uri" (0 or more))."

Is this saying some spec text isn't tested? Or that some tests need updating?

Received on Tuesday, 4 September 2012 13:45:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:07 UTC