W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2012


From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:01:48 +0000
Message-ID: <4F606C8C.1010709@epimorphics.com>
To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On 14/03/12 09:48, Polleres, Axel wrote:
> Just my two cents to emphasize that I tend to agree on that: I
> believe we need DISTINCT() to address JC-4 and related comments in a
> fashion agreeable to the commenters.

Could you expand on "we need DISTINCT"?  Is that just a technical point 
that DISTINCT covers more or a political point about the comments?

What about the lesser case of just {*}{+} and *+ changes?

Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2012 10:02:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:06 UTC