W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2012


From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 09:29:48 -0400
Message-ID: <4F609D4C.6010605@thefigtrees.net>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
CC: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On 3/14/2012 6:01 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> On 14/03/12 09:48, Polleres, Axel wrote:
>> Just my two cents to emphasize that I tend to agree on that: I
>> believe we need DISTINCT() to address JC-4 and related comments in a
>> fashion agreeable to the commenters.
> Could you expand on "we need DISTINCT"? Is that just a technical point
> that DISTINCT covers more or a political point about the comments?
> What about the lesser case of just {*}{+} and *+ changes?

The feedback that Axel has received offline is that the commenters are 
not clear on what the effects of mixing counting and non-counting 
operators would be with respect to their original concerns, and so 
adding those alone would not sufficiently address their concerns. They 
would be satisfied by the inclusion of DISTINCT/ALL-PATHS.


> Andy
Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2012 13:30:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:06 UTC