- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:12:01 +0000
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On 03/02/12 17:58, Gregory Williams wrote:
> On Feb 2, 2012, at 9:24 PM, Chimezie Ogbuji wrote:
>
>> I was planning on generating some EARL for FuXi's implementation of
>> several of the SPARQL 1.1 Entailment Regimes, this weekend. Is the
>> format of the EARL the same as it was in SPARQL 1.0 or are there some
>> documented differences?
>
> I believe it's the same as 1.0, but to be honest, in developing the implementations report code I based my work on existing EARL data, not any documentation. There's a link to the EARL files that I'm currently able to work with at the bottom of the implementations report:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/implementations/
>
> The one possible addition to the 1.0-style EARL that would help me with the reports is if you could make earl:subject point at a IRI (not a bnode), and have that thing use doap:name to give it a name ("FuXi") suitable for the column heading in the implementation report.
>
> thanks,
> .greg
>
>
Greg,
You alerted me to differences into vocabulary
at http://www.w3.org/ns/earl.
Did you find anything that a EARL generator from last time should change
for you?
Andy
Received on Friday, 3 February 2012 18:12:38 UTC