W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2012

Re: Getting ready to publish our documents (pubrules etc.)

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2012 19:55:26 -0500
To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <1325465726.2589.53.camel@waldron>
On Thu, 2011-12-29 at 20:13 +0100, Axel Polleres wrote:
> Hi all,
> Following the resolutions from the last telco before christmas, I started to prepare docs for publication - starting with the Update doc -
> with publication date Jan 2nd and comments period until Feb 2nd.
> I am not really sure we can really achieve Jan 2nd as publication date,

Yeah, also, it turns out to be a holiday around here ("New Years Day
Observed").   We should probably aim for Jan 5.

     -- Sandro

>  but here are the steps summarized again which we need 
> to do for all other docs as well ...
>  1) I have followed the steps from http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Pub-Process...
>  2) ...I have copied the final version to the following pub folder on CVS: WWW/2009/sparql/docs/pub/20120102, 
>     example file: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/pub/20120102/WD-sparql11-update-20120102/ (pubrules checked)
>  1) In addition to the points mentioned at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Pub-Process, I have added a red wgNote box 
>     (this uses local.css, also committed in the pub folder) which says the following in the Status section:
>     "Given that sufficient implementation experience has already been reported by the time of the 
>      next publication round, the SPARQL Working Group is considering to skip Candidate Recommendation 
>      phase and advance this specification directly to Proposed Recommendation with its next version."
>  4) Important: For all documents, we need to update particularly the Status section... Unless the changes to 
>     previous version are up-to-date (.e. if they still refer to the one but last version), 
>     I would by default simply remove such comments on changes from the previous version. 
> So, @alleditors: Let me know if you can do the same for your respective docs, ideally by tomorrow COB... 
> if not, and if we want to stick with Jan 2nd, I will just try to proceed likewise with the other docs myself, 
> not sure if I manage before Monday, but let's see, will sort out the earliest pub date otherwise with Lee 
> and Sandro.
> If I don't hear back from you, let me wish @all a great coming year 2012 already!
> cheers,
> Axel
Received on Monday, 2 January 2012 00:55:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:05 UTC