- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 10:12:45 -0400
- To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@siemens.com>
- CC: Axel Polleres <axel@polleres.net>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Axel, You have the same URL for all three tests. Care to try again? :) Lee On 6/12/2012 6:17 PM, Axel Polleres wrote: > I added some test cases on scoping for BIND a while ago... I'd suggest some more on scoping in connection with sub-selects: > > Positive: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/syntax-query/syntax-SELECTscope1.rq > Negative: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/syntax-query/syntax-SELECTscope1.rq > Positive: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/syntax-query/syntax-SELECTscope1.rq > > best, > Axel
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2012 14:13:17 UTC