W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: 3 further syntax tests proposed for variable scoping

From: Axel Polleres <axel@polleres.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:20:49 +0200
Message-Id: <B96222FF-A391-4992-844E-C088AB8D4AB4@polleres.net>
To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
sorry for that...

 now with corrected URLs (all three test cases are in the respective manifest):

>> Positive: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/syntax-query/syntax-SELECTscope1.rq
>> Negative: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/syntax-query/syntax-SELECTscope2.rq
>> Positive:  http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/syntax-query/syntax-SELECTscope3.rq



Axel

-- 
Dr. Axel Polleres
url: http://www.polleres.net/  twitter: AxelPolleres



On 19 Jun 2012, at 16:12, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:

> Axel,
> 
> You have the same URL for all three tests. Care to try again? :)
> 
> Lee
> 
> 
> On 6/12/2012 6:17 PM, Axel Polleres wrote:
>> I added some test cases on scoping for BIND a while ago... I'd suggest some more on scoping in connection with sub-selects:
>> 
>> Positive: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/syntax-query/syntax-SELECTscope1.rq
>> Negative: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/syntax-query/syntax-SELECTscope1.rq
>> Positive:  http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/syntax-query/syntax-SELECTscope1.rq
>> 
>> best,
>> Axel
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2012 09:21:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:48 GMT