- From: Axel Polleres <axel@polleres.net>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:20:49 +0200
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
sorry for that... now with corrected URLs (all three test cases are in the respective manifest): >> Positive: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/syntax-query/syntax-SELECTscope1.rq >> Negative: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/syntax-query/syntax-SELECTscope2.rq >> Positive: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/syntax-query/syntax-SELECTscope3.rq Axel -- Dr. Axel Polleres url: http://www.polleres.net/ twitter: AxelPolleres On 19 Jun 2012, at 16:12, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > Axel, > > You have the same URL for all three tests. Care to try again? :) > > Lee > > > On 6/12/2012 6:17 PM, Axel Polleres wrote: >> I added some test cases on scoping for BIND a while ago... I'd suggest some more on scoping in connection with sub-selects: >> >> Positive: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/syntax-query/syntax-SELECTscope1.rq >> Negative: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/syntax-query/syntax-SELECTscope1.rq >> Positive: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/syntax-query/syntax-SELECTscope1.rq >> >> best, >> Axel > >
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2012 09:21:50 UTC