W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: For review: VALUES

From: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 09:50:57 -0400
Cc: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <E0329D99-56A9-4C7E-B333-BC463C591D79@evilfunhouse.com>
To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
On May 22, 2012, at 7:29 AM, Steve Harris wrote:

> I've only read 10.2, but it seems good to me.
> The only thing I wonder about is if UNDEF would be better as UNBOUND, to match BOUND(). It's more characters, but might be more consistent?

I thought the same thing, but am getting more and more reluctant to change things that we've had around for a long time…

Received on Tuesday, 22 May 2012 13:51:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:06 UTC