Re: For review: VALUES

On May 22, 2012, at 7:29 AM, Steve Harris wrote:

> I've only read 10.2, but it seems good to me.
> 
> The only thing I wonder about is if UNDEF would be better as UNBOUND, to match BOUND(). It's more characters, but might be more consistent?

I thought the same thing, but am getting more and more reluctant to change things that we've had around for a long time…

.greg