- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 12:29:49 +0100
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I've only read 10.2, but it seems good to me. The only thing I wonder about is if UNDEF would be better as UNBOUND, to match BOUND(). It's more characters, but might be more consistent? - Steve On 2012-05-21, at 20:50, Andy Seaborne wrote: > The material for VALUES is in rq25 and I'd appreciate any review bandwidth people have. > > The sections that are affected are: > > Description section: > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25.xml#inline-data > > Translation of VALUES in a query pattern: > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25.xml#sparqlTranslateGraphPatterns > > Translation of trailing VALUES clause: > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25.xml#convertGroupAggSelectExpressions > > Andy > -- Steve Harris, CTO Garlik, a part of Experian 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK +44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 653331 VAT # 887 1335 93 Registered office: Landmark House, Experian Way, Nottingham, Notts, NG80 1ZZ
Received on Tuesday, 22 May 2012 11:30:42 UTC