W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: For review: VALUES

From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 12:29:49 +0100
Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <EC490CAB-72FB-4394-B9ED-591E1FB64EE9@garlik.com>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
I've only read 10.2, but it seems good to me.

The only thing I wonder about is if UNDEF would be better as UNBOUND, to match BOUND(). It's more characters, but might be more consistent?

- Steve

On 2012-05-21, at 20:50, Andy Seaborne wrote:

> The material for VALUES is in rq25 and I'd appreciate any review bandwidth people have.
> 
> The sections that are affected are:
> 
> Description section:
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25.xml#inline-data
> 
> Translation of VALUES in a query pattern:
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25.xml#sparqlTranslateGraphPatterns
> 
> Translation of trailing VALUES clause:
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/query-1.1/rq25.xml#convertGroupAggSelectExpressions
> 
> 	Andy
> 

-- 
Steve Harris, CTO
Garlik, a part of Experian
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 653331 VAT # 887 1335 93
Registered office: Landmark House, Experian Way, Nottingham, Notts, NG80 1ZZ
Received on Tuesday, 22 May 2012 11:30:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:48 GMT