W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: DB-5 response

From: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 18:37:29 -0500
Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <5C9958AF-E494-4597-A075-50132DC31BEE@evilfunhouse.com>
To: Paul Gearon <pgearon@revelytix.com>
On Dec 19, 2011, at 5:56 PM, Paul Gearon wrote:

> In point 8 there were some comments on the lack of definition of how
> to define the URI of a graph store. I seem to recall that when this
> was mentioned a few weeks ago that it had been intentionally specified
> at its current level. However, since the comments refer to the service
> description and protocol documents, I'd appreciate any input from Greg
> or Chimezie.

I think the text you've got about it intentionally not being specified is fine.

Beyond that, I really have no idea why he says: "The SPARQL 1.1 Service Description spec does define the notion of an sd:DataSet" [sic]. The Service Description document says:

"""
An instance of sd:Dataset represents a RDF Dataset comprised of a default graph and zero or more named graphs.
"""

With a link to the definition of "RDF Dataset" in the query document. I'm not sure if that deserves explicitly calling out in the response, but I don't think there needs to be any change in the documents.

.greg
Received on Monday, 19 December 2011 23:37:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:47 GMT