W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2011

DB-5 response

From: Paul Gearon <pgearon@revelytix.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:56:02 -0500
Message-ID: <CAOQ8B2GUBd3Y9TLAhcpPcASCzjResKZDXfVtSVp8XpNJPLjGGg@mail.gmail.com>
To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

In response to DB-5:

I've created:

In point 8 there were some comments on the lack of definition of how
to define the URI of a graph store. I seem to recall that when this
was mentioned a few weeks ago that it had been intentionally specified
at its current level. However, since the comments refer to the service
description and protocol documents, I'd appreciate any input from Greg
or Chimezie.

Also, David suggested that the text in section 3.1.3 may benefit from
having a decision tree to describe the currently operating dataset
(depending on the use of WITH, USING, and GRAPH). I have not done
this, but would appreciate any feedback as to whether this ought to be

The changes mentioned in the response are all in the Overview.xml in CVS.

Paul Gearon
Received on Monday, 19 December 2011 22:56:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:05 UTC