W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: Question on http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/

From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 23:12:27 +0100
Cc: "Gregory Williams" <greg@evilfunhouse.com>, "SPARQL Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <BA28421E-23F2-48E4-9275-DEE8C3996D96@deri.org>
To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
I see now... I guess I was just confused since as opposed to http://www.w3.org/ns/sparql-service-description
there was no link to the RDF/XML or Turtle in the HTML version (hadn't checked with conneg ... and I see now it's even there in the RDFa)... so all is fine!

thanks,
Axel

On 7 Dec 2011, at 15:47, Ivan Herman wrote:

> Having looked at it... I do not understand. The type triple _is_ there, in all three formats (RDFa, turtle, and rdf/xml)
> 
> Ivan
> 
> On Dec 6, 2011, at 19:18 , Axel Polleres wrote:
> 
> > Hi Ivan, Sandro,
> >
> > While reviewing SPARQL1.1 service description, I had the following remark:
> >
> >>> 13) 3.2.14 sd:resultFormat
> >>>
> >>> (non-critical) A side remark on http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/ ... shouldn't e.g. http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/SPARQL_Results_JSON have at least an RDFa triple stating:
> >>>
> >>> <http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/SPARQL_Results_JSON> a <http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/Format> .
> >>>
> >>> ?
> >>
> > Greg's answer:
> >
> >> Maybe? I don't have strong feelings about this, as the data is available via conneg in RDF/XML and Turtle. If you think RDFa is necessary, we can talk with Ivan about what it would take to add it.
> >
> > So, would it be possible/useful to add these type triples?
> >
> > cheers,
> > Axel
> 
> 
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 7 December 2011 22:13:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:47 GMT