W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: Question on http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 15:47:30 +0100
Cc: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <724A7294-5572-401E-A407-7FAE0F344C29@w3.org>
To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
Having looked at it... I do not understand. The type triple _is_ there, in all three formats (RDFa, turtle, and rdf/xml)

Ivan

On Dec 6, 2011, at 19:18 , Axel Polleres wrote:

> Hi Ivan, Sandro,
> 
> While reviewing SPARQL1.1 service description, I had the following remark:
> 
>>> 13) 3.2.14 sd:resultFormat
>>> 
>>> (non-critical) A side remark on http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/ ... shouldn't e.g. http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/SPARQL_Results_JSON have at least an RDFa triple stating:
>>> 
>>> <http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/SPARQL_Results_JSON> a <http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/Format> .
>>> 
>>> ?
>> 
> Greg's answer:
> 
>> Maybe? I don't have strong feelings about this, as the data is available via conneg in RDF/XML and Turtle. If you think RDFa is necessary, we can talk with Ivan about what it would take to add it.
> 
> So, would it be possible/useful to add these type triples?
> 
> cheers,
> Axel


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Wednesday, 7 December 2011 14:48:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:47 GMT