W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > October to December 2011

Re: has anyone implemented SPARQL 1.1 yet?

From: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 12:20:21 -0500
Message-Id: <5250F971-BBDB-44D9-A0A2-902C0996CC01@evilfunhouse.com>
Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
On Nov 24, 2011, at 10:13 AM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:

> So, does anyone have an implementation that's feature complete for
> SPARQL 1.1, or very likely to be by, oh, the end of January?   If you'll
> be there except for one or two things, what are those things?

I have a complete implementation of everything but entailment (which I don't plan to implement) and the graph store protocol (which will likely be implemented for my system, but not by me an with no certain eta).

Received on Thursday, 24 November 2011 17:21:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:05 UTC