W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2011

Comment DB-8 : response needed?

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:25:54 +0100
Message-ID: <4E7750F2.5070901@epimorphics.com>
To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Is a response needed for DB-8? [1]

I asked David if a response is needed but haven't had a reply [2].

More generally:
We have some straight factual comments (eg. 2011Sep/0013) and the 
current comments process is a bit heavy weight for these.  Can we have a 
lighter weight mechanism for non-LC factual comments?

	Andy

[1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Sep/0001

[2]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Sep/0006
Received on Monday, 19 September 2011 14:26:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:46 GMT