- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:25:54 +0100
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Is a response needed for DB-8? [1] I asked David if a response is needed but haven't had a reply [2]. More generally: We have some straight factual comments (eg. 2011Sep/0013) and the current comments process is a bit heavy weight for these. Can we have a lighter weight mechanism for non-LC factual comments? Andy [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Sep/0001 [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Sep/0006
Received on Monday, 19 September 2011 14:26:37 UTC