W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2011

Comment DB-8 : response needed?

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 15:25:54 +0100
Message-ID: <4E7750F2.5070901@epimorphics.com>
To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Is a response needed for DB-8? [1]

I asked David if a response is needed but haven't had a reply [2].

More generally:
We have some straight factual comments (eg. 2011Sep/0013) and the 
current comments process is a bit heavy weight for these.  Can we have a 
lighter weight mechanism for non-LC factual comments?



Received on Monday, 19 September 2011 14:26:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:04 UTC