W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: Comment DB-8 : response needed?

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:38:04 -0400
Message-ID: <4E7753CC.3090905@thefigtrees.net>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I think it is fine for any WG member who knows the answer to respond to 
those factual comments/questions. Unless the commenter specifies that 
they are unhappy with the design, we do not need an acknowledgement from 
them.

Lee

On 9/19/2011 10:25 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Is a response needed for DB-8? [1]
>
> I asked David if a response is needed but haven't had a reply [2].
>
> More generally:
> We have some straight factual comments (eg. 2011Sep/0013) and the
> current comments process is a bit heavy weight for these. Can we have a
> lighter weight mechanism for non-LC factual comments?
>
> Andy
>
> [1]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Sep/0001
>
> [2]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Sep/0006
>
>
Received on Monday, 19 September 2011 14:38:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:46 GMT