W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: regrets for tomorrow

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 19:47:56 -0400
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Message-ID: <1315871276.10394.3.camel@waldron>
On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 19:30 +0100, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> I've created a new last call version (after Axel's fix today - thx)
> 
>    http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/json-results/json-results-lc2.html
> 
> Guessed publication date of 14/September and 6 weeks last call period. 
> These need checking/changing when the details are decided.

I've asked for a pub date, but haven't heard back.  Hopefully it'll be
the 13th, but if not, I expect it'll be the 15th.

Do we want to take out the cvs log before publication?   I'd be inclined
to, but don't really care.

Also, technically this is a First Public and Last Call Working Draft, so
we'll need to add some words to that effect.  I can do that.  The
pubrules checker will complain that FPWD's shouldn't have a "previous
version" link, but we can/should ignore that complaint.

     -- Sandro

> 	Andy
> 
> On 08/09/11 14:13, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
> > I prefer the latest as well, and am willing to wager that no one's going
> > to be concerned over the process looseness here. :-)
> >
> > Lee
> >
> > On 9/8/2011 9:04 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> >> Axel,
> >>
> >> The WG voted to publish a particular version of the document (the
> >> json-results-lc.html snapshot) so in theory that is the one that should
> >> be published. But the changes are merely editorial (I promise) and
> >> everything should be noted in the CVS log.
> >>
> >> So I don't mind which version is published - I slightly prefer the
> >> latest but this is a little bit non-process.
> >>
> >> Andy
> >>
> >> On 08/09/11 05:51, Axel Polleres wrote:
> >>> Hi Andy,
> >>>
> >>> I am looking into this at the moment, the minor editorial changes on the
> >> json-result format from
> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2011JulSep/0215.html
> >>> already incorporated in
> >> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/json-results/json-results.xml shall
> >> go on board, I assume, yes?)
> >>>
> >>> cheers,
> >>> Axel
> >>>
> >>> On 6 Sep 2011, at 16:10, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Any news on the publishing process?
> >>>>
> >>>> Andy
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 12 September 2011 23:48:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:46 GMT