W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: regrets for tomorrow

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 19:30:14 +0100
Message-ID: <4E6909B6.5090809@epimorphics.com>
To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
I've created a new last call version (after Axel's fix today - thx)

   http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/json-results/json-results-lc2.html

Guessed publication date of 14/September and 6 weeks last call period. 
These need checking/changing when the details are decided.

	Andy

On 08/09/11 14:13, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
> I prefer the latest as well, and am willing to wager that no one's going
> to be concerned over the process looseness here. :-)
>
> Lee
>
> On 9/8/2011 9:04 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>> Axel,
>>
>> The WG voted to publish a particular version of the document (the
>> json-results-lc.html snapshot) so in theory that is the one that should
>> be published. But the changes are merely editorial (I promise) and
>> everything should be noted in the CVS log.
>>
>> So I don't mind which version is published - I slightly prefer the
>> latest but this is a little bit non-process.
>>
>> Andy
>>
>> On 08/09/11 05:51, Axel Polleres wrote:
>>> Hi Andy,
>>>
>>> I am looking into this at the moment, the minor editorial changes on the
>> json-result format from
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2011JulSep/0215.html
>>> already incorporated in
>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/json-results/json-results.xml shall
>> go on board, I assume, yes?)
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>> Axel
>>>
>>> On 6 Sep 2011, at 16:10, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>>>
>>>> Any news on the publishing process?
>>>>
>>>> Andy
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Thursday, 8 September 2011 18:30:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:46 GMT