- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 19:30:14 +0100
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
I've created a new last call version (after Axel's fix today - thx) http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/json-results/json-results-lc2.html Guessed publication date of 14/September and 6 weeks last call period. These need checking/changing when the details are decided. Andy On 08/09/11 14:13, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > I prefer the latest as well, and am willing to wager that no one's going > to be concerned over the process looseness here. :-) > > Lee > > On 9/8/2011 9:04 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: >> Axel, >> >> The WG voted to publish a particular version of the document (the >> json-results-lc.html snapshot) so in theory that is the one that should >> be published. But the changes are merely editorial (I promise) and >> everything should be noted in the CVS log. >> >> So I don't mind which version is published - I slightly prefer the >> latest but this is a little bit non-process. >> >> Andy >> >> On 08/09/11 05:51, Axel Polleres wrote: >>> Hi Andy, >>> >>> I am looking into this at the moment, the minor editorial changes on the >> json-result format from >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2011JulSep/0215.html >>> already incorporated in >> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/json-results/json-results.xml shall >> go on board, I assume, yes?) >>> >>> cheers, >>> Axel >>> >>> On 6 Sep 2011, at 16:10, Andy Seaborne wrote: >>> >>>> Any news on the publishing process? >>>> >>>> Andy >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 8 September 2011 18:30:47 UTC