W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: CSV/TSV results test cases and suggested adaption of JSON results test cases

From: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2011 14:50:20 -0400
Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <636ED02A-341E-48C1-BF53-3465B4EF19B4@evilfunhouse.com>
To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
On Aug 7, 2011, at 2:21 PM, Axel Polleres wrote:

> 1) I added (my understanding of) what CSV and TSV test cases should return in 
> 
>  http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/csv-tsv-res/
> 
> the test cases are:
> 
>   http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/csv-tsv-res/manifest#csv01
>   http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/csv-tsv-res/manifest#tsv01
>   http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/csv-tsv-res/manifest#csv01
>   http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/csv-tsv-res/manifest#tsv02
> 
> these haven't been produced automatically, so please check.

All of these use the SELECT * form. If the variables happen to be projected in a different order than the one assumed in the csv/tsv result files, should the tests fail?

> 2) this brought me to some ommission in the json-res test cases ... where I 
...
> (note that I alsoe renamed the output files from .srj to .json). 

Why?

thanks,
.greg
Received on Sunday, 7 August 2011 18:51:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:46 GMT