W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: SPARQL TC today - late reminder

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 09:18:54 -0400
Message-ID: <4E130F3E.5040104@thefigtrees.net>
To: "Polleres, Axel" <axel.polleres@deri.org>
CC: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org, Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
On 7/5/2011 9:00 AM, Polleres, Axel wrote:
> Dear all,
> apologies for not sending out a proper agenda, we will at least briefly go through the usual topics:
> * Admin
> ** PROPOSED: approve minutes from last week at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2011-06-28
> ** please fill vacation list on http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Vacation_List2011
> * Liaison: any further urgent news from RDF WG or all resolved with last week's discussion?

I ran our general consensus on this (include informative text about how 
SPARQL would change if/when RDF changes as expected) by Sandro off-list 
and he seemed on-board with it. He did bring up what it means about the 
test suite, and suggested we could flag any tests that are dependent on 
this part of RDF in the test suite, so that once RDF matures, 
implementations can know which tests to ignore/alter.

> * Comments
> * AOB

I'd like to get an update on the rechartering, if Sandro is around today.

In general, we really need to step up our efforts to assemble a complete 
test suite & start to figure out what tools / process we'll use to build 
an implementation report.


> (as for the latter, it would be nice if people mention particular things that they think need discussion/TC time in the coming weeks such that Lee and myself can sync on when scheduling them or, respectively, any input on general strategy for how to progress over the summer.)
> BTW: I have Chime and Steve as candidates on the scribe list, if that's right.
> best,
> Axel
Received on Tuesday, 5 July 2011 13:19:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:04 UTC