W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: Draft response for AZ-1 (Ent. Regimes)

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 09:42:31 +0100
Message-ID: <4E12CE77.10300@epimorphics.com>
To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
"the D-entailment regime does guarantee anything beyond the RDFS regime."

Should that be "does not guarantee"?

	Andy

On 04/07/11 19:18, Birte Glimm wrote:
> I've prepared a draft response to AZ-1
> (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2011Jun/0009.html)
> at:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:AZ-1
>
> Apart from several minor editorial changes, the Ent. Reg. doc now has
> a new (informative) Section that contains explanations that apply to
> all ent. regimes. Before this text was scattered across the doc.
>
> Cheers,
> Birte
>
> --
> Dr. Birte Glimm, Room 309
> Department of Computer Science
> University of Oxford
> Parks Road
> Oxford
> OX1 3QD
> United Kingdom
> +44 (0)1865 283520
>
Received on Tuesday, 5 July 2011 08:43:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:46 GMT