W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2011

Re: ACTION-419: Sync with Birte on Datatypes for canonicalisation

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:58:54 +0100
Message-ID: <4D922BEE.4010406@epimorphics.com>
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
CC: Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, Matthew Perry <matthew.perry@oracle.com>, W3C SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>


On 29/03/11 18:52, Bijan Parsia wrote:
> On 29 Mar 2011, at 18:46, Bijan Parsia wrote:
>
>> On 29 Mar 2011, at 18:19, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>>
>>> On 29/03/11 18:04, Bijan Parsia wrote:
>>>> On 29 Mar 2011, at 17:54, Birte Glimm wrote:
> [snip]
>>>> Are you using Schema 1.1 (recommended even though not a recommendation!).
>>>
>>> Curious - why?
>>
>> My and Boris's experience in the OWL WG is that the 1.1 specs are *much* superior in organization, clarity, and detail and well as nailing down various aspects.
> [snip]
>
> We also thought it was going to be done "soon" :)
>
> Note that 1.1. seems to be what Oracle is doing (no surprise, their being still active in the XS group).

Always possible as SPARQL Query says nothing about processing the data 
getting into the dataset so the fact the original data says xsd:integer 
and the results say xsd:decimal is explainable.  Helpful if the SPARQL 
query also has canonicalization applied on parsing.  SPARQL Update is 
interesting.

	Andy

>
> Cheers,
> Bijan.
Received on Tuesday, 29 March 2011 18:59:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:45 GMT