W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2011

Re: ACTION-419: Sync with Birte on Datatypes for canonicalisation

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:52:28 +0100
Cc: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, Matthew Perry <matthew.perry@oracle.com>, W3C SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <0E12232A-096C-4590-A1F6-46AB9FB973B5@cs.man.ac.uk>
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
On 29 Mar 2011, at 18:46, Bijan Parsia wrote:

> On 29 Mar 2011, at 18:19, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> 
>> On 29/03/11 18:04, Bijan Parsia wrote:
>>> On 29 Mar 2011, at 17:54, Birte Glimm wrote:
[snip]
>>> Are you using Schema 1.1 (recommended even though not a recommendation!).
>> 
>> Curious - why?
> 
> My and Boris's experience in the OWL WG is that the 1.1 specs are *much* superior in organization, clarity, and detail and well as nailing down various aspects.
[snip]

We also thought it was going to be done "soon" :)

Note that 1.1. seems to be what Oracle is doing (no surprise, their being still active in the XS group).

Cheers,
Bijan.
Received on Tuesday, 29 March 2011 17:52:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:45 GMT