- From: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:15:59 -0400
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Mar 23, 2011, at 10:38 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > Is there enough coverage in: > > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/syntax-update-1/ > > syntax-update-bad-13.ru > syntax-update-bad-14.ru > syntax-update-bad-15.ru > > Probably better to add coverage if not, rather than spread the syntax tests through out the test suite. Yeah, hadn't looked much into the existing negative syntax tests. I'd be happy for those to stand (if there's coverage), or to add to them (if there isn't). I've also noticed that the syntax tests have started to leak out of the syntax directories already. thanks .greg
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2011 22:16:30 UTC