W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2011

Re: delete-insert test cases

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:38:23 +0000
Message-ID: <4D8A05DF.9030909@epimorphics.com>
To: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>


On 22/03/11 15:05, Gregory Williams wrote:
> I'd like to suggest that we change the following tests to negative syntax tests based on the recent prohibition of bnodes in DELETE templates:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/delete-insert/manifest#dawg-delete-insert-03
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/delete-insert/manifest#dawg-delete-insert-03b
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/delete-insert/manifest#dawg-delete-insert-05
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/delete-insert/manifest#dawg-delete-insert-06
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/delete-insert/manifest#dawg-delete-insert-07
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/delete-insert/manifest#dawg-delete-insert-07b
>
> Tests 05 and 06 actually use the same query with different data, so they'd end up being duplicate syntax tests.
>
> .greg

Is there enough coverage in:

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/syntax-update-1/

syntax-update-bad-13.ru
syntax-update-bad-14.ru
syntax-update-bad-15.ru

Probably better to add coverage if not, rather than spread the syntax 
tests through out the test suite.

	Andy
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2011 14:39:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:45 GMT