W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2011

Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates

From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 23:08:35 +0000
Cc: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>, Paul Gearon <gearon@ieee.org>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <73F9308C-7391-4A2C-B6E3-E14EC8E2949E@garlik.com>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
On 2011-02-22, at 17:28, Andy Seaborne wrote:

> rq25 also says:
> 
> """
> If any such instantiation produces a triple containing an unbound
> variable or an illegal RDF construct, such as a literal in subject or predicate position, then that triple is not included in the output RDF graph.
> """
> N.B. literals-not-objects as well.
> from SPARQL 1.0 which seems sufficient to me, unless we find time to include it in the formal section as suggested by Birte.

Yes, I think that's certainly sufficient, I just didn't find it when I was looking for text to back up my recollection.

- Steve

-- 
Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Tuesday, 22 February 2011 23:09:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:45 GMT