- From: Paul Gearon <gearon@ieee.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:03:06 -0500
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Cc: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I like #2 as well. Paul On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net> wrote: > I prefer option 2. > > Lee > > On 1/26/2011 7:13 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: >> >> As a Note it is: >> >> "Serializing SPARQL Query Results in JSON" >> Short name: /rdf-sparql-json-res/ >> >> In choosing doc names so far, we have tended to use "SPARQL 1.1" >> terminology. >> >> Suggestions for the REC-track version of the JSON results: >> >> 1 - Keep it the same full name and short name as the Note >> >> 2 - "SPARQL 1.1 Query Results JSON Format" >> /sparql11-results-json/ >> (and redirect from old 'latest' link?) >> >> 3 - other ... >> >> For reference: The XML version is >> "SPARQL Query Results XML Format" >> /rdf-sparql-XMLres/ >> >> Andy >> >> > >
Received on Friday, 28 January 2011 17:03:39 UTC