W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2011

Re: Names (long and short) for JSON results doc

From: Paul Gearon <gearon@ieee.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:03:06 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTikBbR0xeH-TYot0X3sFFkvT9DjWmStnM4bdnvc8@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Cc: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I like #2 as well.

Paul

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net> wrote:
> I prefer option 2.
>
> Lee
>
> On 1/26/2011 7:13 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>>
>> As a Note it is:
>>
>> "Serializing SPARQL Query Results in JSON"
>> Short name: /rdf-sparql-json-res/
>>
>> In choosing doc names so far, we have tended to use "SPARQL 1.1"
>> terminology.
>>
>> Suggestions for the REC-track version of the JSON results:
>>
>> 1 - Keep it the same full name and short name as the Note
>>
>> 2 - "SPARQL 1.1 Query Results JSON Format"
>> /sparql11-results-json/
>> (and redirect from old 'latest' link?)
>>
>> 3 - other ...
>>
>> For reference: The XML version is
>> "SPARQL Query Results XML Format"
>> /rdf-sparql-XMLres/
>>
>> Andy
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Friday, 28 January 2011 17:03:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:45 GMT