W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2011

Re: Update Protocol messages

From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:06:21 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTimwuouZty2jq4FNNgczUjuZrCvk6RC_5b8q+Dq3@mail.gmail.com>
To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
We did discuss this at some point and I believe there was a consensus
that it ought to be "update".

Lee


On 1/24/11, Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com> wrote:
> From what I remember from the protocol telecon, there will be two methods,
> one is x-www-form-urlencoded:
>
> POST /update/test HTTP/1.1
> Host: localhost:8888
> Accept: text/plain
> Content-Length: 62
> Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
>
> [???]=INSERT%20DATA%20%7B%20%3Ca%3E%20%3Cp%3E%20%3Cb%3E%20%7D
>
> but what should [???] be?
>
> FWIW, 4store uses "update", and 5store uses "query" - hedging our bets :)
>
> I'm working on some cross-store client code at the moment, and it's a bit of
> a blocker. I have no particular preference, but would like a decision one
> way or the other.
>
> - Steve
>
> --
> Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
> 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
> +44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
> Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
> Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
>
Received on Monday, 24 January 2011 14:06:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:45 GMT