- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 20:25:13 +0000
- To: Chimezie Ogbuji <chimezie@gmail.com>
- CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 21/01/11 17:28, Chimezie Ogbuji wrote: > I had an ACTION from an earlier teleconference to propose alternative > names for the HTTP/Update specification. Below are (numbered) > suggestions, starting with the 2 Dave Beckett suggested along with > others suggested during that teleconference: > > 1. SPARQL 1.1 RDF Graph Management Protocol > 2. SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset Management Protocol > 3. SPARQL 1.1 RESTful Graph Protocol > 4. SPARQL 1.1 HTTP Graph Protocol > 5. SPARQL 1.1 HTTP Graph Management Protocol > 6. SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol > > There was a suggestion of removing SPARQL 1.1 from the name, so > alternatives are: > > > 7. RDF Graph Management Protocol > 8. RDF Dataset Management Protocol > 9. RESTful Graph Protocol > 10. HTTP Graph Protocol > 11. HTTP Graph Management Protocol > 12. RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol > > My personal preference is 12 and 6 > > -- Chime > My preferences: 6 > 4 = 3 > 12 > 10 = 9 The pattern is: "SPARQL 1.1" "RDF Dataset" before "RDF Graph" before "HTTP Graph" HTTP or RESTful before "Management" I think, on balance, the "SPARQL 1.1" is to be preferred because service description and entailment have the phrase in them. Andy
Received on Sunday, 23 January 2011 20:25:50 UTC