W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2011

Re: Draft response for CommentResponse:JP-2

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 10:42:55 +0000
Message-ID: <4D39632F.1010902@epimorphics.com>
To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>

On 21/01/11 09:52, Axel Polleres wrote:
> To go ahead, how about going with your version and just adding a sentence in the end as follows to stress that last point:
> "An implementation is free to implement evaluation in anyway it chooses proved it results in the same answers. The WG felt that using an algorithm was the most helpful way to specify the feature, especially to implementers. We added a respective note in the current Editor's draft in the Definition of the Evaluation of ArbitraryLengthPath."
> With that, I'd be fine to send it off!
> cheers,
> Axel

The current text already states that point.  Let's not micro-manage 
every comment response.

Received on Friday, 21 January 2011 10:43:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:03 UTC