W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2011

Re: Draft response for CommentResponse:JP-2

From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 12:32:14 +0000
Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <0AE86F32-B6D6-4373-B034-536DD3435EA9@deri.org>
To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
> The current text already states that point.  Let's not micro-manage every comment response.

Andy,

please send it off, with or without the small sentence hinting on the added note in the draft. I just *suggested* 
to hint on the concrete action taken, but anyways, I am also fine if you send it without.

Axel

On 21 Jan 2011, at 10:42, Andy Seaborne wrote:

> 
> 
> On 21/01/11 09:52, Axel Polleres wrote:
>> To go ahead, how about going with your version and just adding a sentence in the end as follows to stress that last point:
>> 
>> "An implementation is free to implement evaluation in anyway it chooses proved it results in the same answers. The WG felt that using an algorithm was the most helpful way to specify the feature, especially to implementers. We added a respective note in the current Editor's draft in the Definition of the Evaluation of ArbitraryLengthPath."
>> 
>> With that, I'd be fine to send it off!
>> 
>> cheers,
>> Axel
> 
> The current text already states that point.  Let's not micro-manage every comment response.
> 
>    Andy
> 
Received on Friday, 21 January 2011 12:32:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:45 GMT