W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > January to March 2011

Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 20:59:40 +0000
Message-ID: <4D2238BC.2000903@epimorphics.com>
To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>


On 03/01/11 17:16, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
>> I noticed that change - OK for CONSTRUCT and DESCRIBE.
> I'd think the same logic would apply to ASK (and to subselect, but
> I'll argue that below).
>

I just missed ASK from the list.

	Andy
Received on Monday, 3 January 2011 21:00:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:45 GMT