- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 13:01:41 +0000
- To: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 03/01/11 17:16, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> +
> I like using BINDINGs in subselects for getting my head around (i.e.
> debugging) aggregate queries as it puts the pre-aggregated result set
> directly in my face. I use this for didactic and testing purposes:
> http://swobjects.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/swobjects/branches/sparql11/tests/sparql11/groupBy-f-having-f.rq?revision=1264&view=markup
More generally, inline data tables - i.e. the ability to put data into a
query directly. There are some ways to this - BINDINGS+SubSELECT but
also anywhere AS is used can be combined with UNION to produce inline
data. The latter may be very verbose :-)
A more consistent approach might be:
TABLE ?a ?b ?c { (1 2 3) (4 5 6) }
to put anywhere in graph pattern.
(not a proposal for this version of the spec)
Andy
Received on Tuesday, 4 January 2011 13:07:28 UTC