W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: Fwd: Re: SPARQL/RDF WGs Coordination on Graph Terminology

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:04:08 +0100
Message-ID: <4DFE0FE8.6090001@epimorphics.com>
To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Reminder: SPARQL/RDF WGs Coordination on Graph Terminology
Please add yourself soon so we can close the poll.

The current top dates are rather split:

Wed 22 / Wed 6 / Wed 13
15:00 London, 16:00 Amsterdam, 10:00 Boston, 07:00 San Francisco

	Andy

On 13/06/11 21:19, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: SPARQL/RDF WGs Coordination on Graph Terminology
> Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:29:50 +0000
> Resent-From: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
> Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:27:38 +0100
> From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
> To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
>
>
>
> On 13/06/11 19:27, David Wood wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Lee suggested [1] that the RDF WG should look carefully at graph
>> terminology being adopted by the SPARQL WG. This message suggests a
>> telecon among interested parties to align graph terminology between
>> the working groups.
>>
>> We can meet directly before the RDF telecon time on Wednesdays at
>> 10:00 US EST, or at another time if you care to suggest.
>
> Good time slot for me - although preferably not this week (not a blocker).
>
> 22nd June?
>
> I put on a Doodle poll for the next few Wednesdays:
>
> http://www.doodle.com/iny935vc6n67vxpv
>
> Andy
>
>>
>> Please note that this completes Guus' action [2], which I think should
>> have been given to me.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dave
>>
>> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011May/0192.html
>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/actions/58
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Sunday, 19 June 2011 15:04:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:46 GMT