W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2011

Re: while we are rechartering.... (csv)

From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 17:31:58 +0100
Message-ID: <4DE6697E.9090008@epimorphics.com>
To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
CC: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>, public-rdf-dawg@w3.org


On 01/06/11 17:19, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
> On 6/1/2011 12:15 PM, Sandro Hawke wrote:
>> On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 16:10 +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
>>> On 2011-06-01, at 15:45, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 01/06/11 14:59, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
>>>>> We implement this in Anzo. It's very useful.
>>>>>
>>>>> But, we don't have the bandwidth to produce a new recommendation. I
>>>>> can't in good conscience support this work at this time.
>>>>>
>>>>> Lee
>>>>
>>>> I'll do it.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/csv-tsv-results/results-csv-tsv.html
>>>>
>>>> We can at least do a NOTE but for this, given deployed experience,
>>>> the additional REC cost is lower than it might otherwise be. Testing
>>>> is one such cost but we have to do JSON results testing so adding a
>>>> parallel .csv and .tsv versions would be enough and there are
>>>> already tools to produce the formats.
>>>>
>>>> There is no need for content type registration if we go with
>>>> existing content types. There are text/csv and
>>>> text/tab-separated-values.
>>>
>>> I'm happy to help out, as I think it's important.
>>>
>>> I think I agree with Lee that Rec track would be unwise though.
>>
>> Can we compromise in the new charter by making this a time-permitting
>> feature, optionally on the Rec Track? So we'll try to do it as Note,
>> but if somehow circumstances give us the time, we're allowed to make
>> this a Rec. And maybe have a WG Resolution that it'll be a Note, to
>> make it clear we wont even discuss it being Rec until/unless the chairs
>> decide there's enough new information to re-open the issue.
>
> I'm OK with that approach.

I'm OK with this except I don't think it's a "new information" matter 
but a "decide later" matter.

	Andy

> Lee
>
>>
>> -- Sandro
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Received on Wednesday, 1 June 2011 16:32:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:15:46 GMT