Hi all, everything is fixed now. This discharges me of that action. cheers, Carlos 2011/4/26 Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> > binding05: > has no BINDING clause > > SELECT ?s ?o1 ?o2 > { > ?s ?p1 ?o1 . > ?s ?p2 ?o2 . > } > > so I'd expect ?o1 and ?o2 in both orders in results which is more results > than in the solutions proposed. > > Andy > >Received on Friday, 13 May 2011 11:38:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:04 UTC